Shame Matters

This article was authored by Suzette Misrachi, is a professional supervisor specialising in trauma and grief of competent and non-disordered adult children of parents with a severe mental illness, a mental health practitioner, psychotherapist and international presenter. This article was originally published in Mind Cafe, May, 2016 Issue 20.

The experience of shame occurs in most people’s lives, which in turn influences their actions and behaviours (Dearing & Tangney, 2011). But do we know what shame is and how we should regard it?

What is shame?

There are many definitions of shame and ways of understanding it. However, we can distil our understanding of shame as a self-conscious, deceptive emotion, arising from self-determined and self-relevant understandings of presumed inadequacy, exposed failures or transgressions, leaving one feeling impotent, ineffective or diminished in self-worth (see Shepard and Rabinowitz, 2013). Accordingly, shame leads towards a sense of hopelessness, disempowerment, self-focus and withdrawal, leaving one with very little room to move. The opposite experience would therefore be pride, honour, self-respect and healthy self-esteem.

Clinicians need to know what shame is. Dearing and Tangney (2011) emphasise the importance of knowing the difference between shame (I am bad) vs. guilt (I did something bad). Clarification of this difference is critical because it dictates and influences clinical decision-making processes. Because shame relates to appraisal of one’s entire self (‘who I am’) it is therefore tied to a person’s sense of identity. While guilt offers the individual something more specific to work with towards redress, shame being non-specific does not. Therefore, individuals with a sense of shame have less personal control or agency about their situation compared to the merely guilt-burdened.

Goss, Gilbert and Allan (1994) describe two forms of shame which interact, mutually reinforcing each other: (1) external shame, in which the person believes they caused someone to think less of them or they fear rejection if undesirable aspects of themselves were exposed, and (2) internal shame in which the person carries negative feelings and thoughts about themselves, e.g., they might be critical of an aspect of self they dislike, commonly a physical attribute.

According to Stadter (2011), shame occurs within three distinct self-experiences: (1) the bad shamed self (e.g., “I am bad”); (2) the defective shamed self (e.g., person feels “lacking” in a socially valued attribute, such as beauty or intelligence); and (3) the successful shamed self, where successful people feel inadequate or grandiose. They may even feel shame for feeling ashamed. The successful shamed self would be applicable to competent, non-disordered individuals, raised by severely mentally ill parents (Misrachi, 2012).

Is shame good or bad?

This is a tricky question. Information about shame appears vast and controversial (e.g., Gilbert, 1998). Much can be found on shame in visible or easily recognised populations, e.g., refugees (Furukawa & Hunt, 2011); drug-dependent people (Potter-Efron, 2011); people with eating disorders (Sanftner & Tantillo, 2011); women (Buchbinder & Eisikovits, 2003); and men (Dorahy & Clearwater, 2012). Curiously, when compared to more openly discussed community and public health issues, such as stigma, shame is relatively invisible yet also profound. This makes matters worse as shame can then go about powerfully and quietly shaping people’s internal lives precisely because it is not readily discussed (Dearing & Tangney, 2011). This element of ‘secrecy’ makes it a more harmful mechanism because it is capable of self-generating, multiplying its potency. It is for this reason that Furukawa and Hunt (2011) emphasise that people recovering from interpersonal trauma need help dealing with any felt shame.

Unbridled shame is associated with low interpersonal, psycho-social, psychological and overall poor life functioning that erodes interpersonal relationships (Mollon, 2006). Shame-inflicted individuals lack self-acceptance and feel less socially valued (Harder & Lewis, 1987). This intrudes profoundly on social functioning hence the high prevalence of shame among help-seeking individuals (Gruenewald, Dickerson & Kemeny, 2007).

Some believe shame is a maladaptive emotion because it does not provide or promote anything particularly useful to the person feeling the shame (e.g., Shepard & Rabinowitz, 2013). On the other hand, Tangeney, Stuewig and Martinez (2014) suggest shame has both constructive and destructive potential, with research calling into question “the presumed function of shame as an inhibitor of immoral or illegal behaviour” (p.799).

Greenberg and Iwakabe (2011) differentiate adaptive from maladaptive shame. Adaptive being bearable as it helps individuals adjust their behaviour for their betterment and that of others, maladaptive being the opposite. It is this maladaptive type of shame that is understood as requiring treatment (e.g., Morrison, 2011).

Still others see shame as neither good nor bad but rather a survival mechanism. This makes sense. For instance, Siegel and Solomon (2003) see shame as blocking or suppressing arousal to prevent being overwhelmed in threatening environments. Herman (2007) takes this an important further step. She sees shame as an internal working model developed in which basic needs and a sense of personal integrity are compromised for the sake of psycho-emotional safety. This is particularly the case for children dependent on their parents or caregivers for their basic needs to be met.

Overall the shame literature appears to offer clinicians three take-home messages:

  1. Don’t be tempted to withdraw from shame feelings because this is “not deemed helpful in therapy” (Dorahy & Gorgas, 2011, p.58);
  2. Help patients dissolve their shame by tracing its origins from early attachment and childhood development to support an appreciation of its etiological role and function (Mills, 2005); and
  3. Sensitively bring the shame into the open so it can be transformed (Greenberg & Iwakabe, 2011).

Irrespective of whether shame is good or bad, you and I can’t escape it because, unless one is a psychopath, shame lurks in the background of any therapy hour for almost everyone – including therapists themselves (Ladany, Klinger & Kulp, 2011). This implies that detecting, distinguishing and clinically working through uncomfortable, shame-soaked moments, and being able to differentiate shame from guilt are not enough. We also need to be able to self-identify and process our own shame (Dearing & Tangney, 2011).

References

  1. Buchbinder, E. & Z. Eisikovits (2003). Battered Women’s Entrapment in Shame: A Phenomenological Study. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 73(4): 355-366.
  2. Dearing, R. L., & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.). (2011 ). Shame in the therapy hour (1st ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  3. Dorahy, M.J., & Clearwater, K. (2012) Shame and Guilt in Men Exposed to Childhood Sexual Abuse: A Qualitative Investigation, Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 21:2, 155-175.
  4. Dorahy, M.J. & Gorgas, J. (2011). Therapist’s immediate responses to shame disclosures in clients: An experimental investigation with non-clinical participants. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand College of Clinical Psychologists (NZCCP) National Conference 2011, 19-20 Mar 2011. (Conference Contribution – Other – Oral presentations).
  5. Furukawa, E., & Hunt, D. J. (2011). Therapy with refugees and other immigrants experiencing shame: A multicultural perspective. In R. L. Dearing & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Shame in the therapy hour (1st ed., pp. 195-215). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  6. Gilbert, P. (1998). What is shame? Some core issues and controversies. In P. Gilbert & B. Andrews (Eds.), Shame: Interpersonal behavior, psychopathology, and culture (pp. 3–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Goss, K., Gilbert, P., & Allan, S. (1994). An exploration of shame measures–I: The Other as Shamer Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 713–717.
  8. Greenberg, L., S, & Iwakabe, S. (2011). Emotion-focused therapy and shame. In R. L. Dearing & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Shame in the therapy hour (1st ed., pp. 69-90). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  9. Gruenewald, T. L., Dickerson, S. S., Kemeny, M. E. (2007). A social function for self conscious emotions: The social self preservation theory. In Tracy, J. L., Robins, R. W., Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), The Self-Conscious Emotions: Theory and Research. Guilford Press, New York, pp. 68-87.
  10. Harder, D. W., Lewis, S. J., (1987). The assessment of shame and guilt. In Spielberger, C., Butcher, J. N. (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment, Volume 6. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 89-114.
  11. Herman, J. L. (2007). Shattered Shame States and their Repair. The John Bowlby Memorial Lecture Saturday March 10, 2007 Judith Lewis Herman, M.D. Final Draft: September 2007
  12. See: http://www.challiance.org/Resource.ashx?sn=VOVShattered20ShameJHerman
  13. Ladany, N., Klinger, R., Kulp, L. (2011) Therapist Shame: Implication for therapy and supervision. In Shame in the therapy hour. R. L. Dearing and J. P. Tangney. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association pp. 307-323.
  14. Mills, R. S. L. (2005). Taking stock of the developmental literature on shame.
  15. Developmental review. 25, 26-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2004.08.001
  16. Misrachi, S. (2012). Lives Unseen: Unacknowledged Trauma of Non-Disordered, Competent Adult Children of Parents with a Severe Mental Illness (ACOPSMI). (Master’s thesis, The University of Melbourne. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11343/37852
  17. Mollon, P. (2006). Shame and jealousy: The hidden turmoils. Karnac, London.
  18. Morrison, A.P. (2011). The Psychodynamics of Shame. In Shame in the therapy hour. R. L. Dearing and J. P. Tangney. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association pp. 23–44.
  19. Potter-Efron, R.T. (2011). Therapy With Shame-Prone Alcoholic and Drug-Dependent Clients. In Shame in the therapy hour. R. L. Dearing and J. P. Tangney. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association pp. 219 – 236.
  20. Sanftner, J.L. & Tantillo, M. (2011). Body Image and Eating Disorders: A Compelling Source of Shame for Women. In Shame in the therapy hour. R. L. Dearing and J. P. Tangney. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association pp. 277 – 304.
  21. Shepard, D. S., & Rabinowitz, F.E., (2013). The Power of Shame in Men Who Are Depressed: Implications for Counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development October 2013 Vol 91 pp. 451–457.
  22. Siegel, D. Solomon, M. (eds.), (2003) In Healing Trauma: Attachment, Mind, Body, and Brain . W.W. Norton & Company New York.
  23. Stadter, M., (2011). The Inner World of Shaming and Ashamed: An Object Relations Perspective and Therapeutic Approach. In Shame in the therapy hour. R. L. Dearing and J. P. Tangney. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association pp. 45 -68.
  24. Tangney, J.P., Stuewig, J., & Martinez, A.G., (2014). Two Faces of Shame: The Roles of Shame and Guilt in Predicting Recidivism Psychological Science March 2014 vol. 25 no. 3 pp. 799-805.